CLCA Legislative Report for Week Ending July 2,
2010
2009-2010 Session
|
AB 49 |
Feuer |
Water
conservation: urban and agricultural water management planning. |
||
|
|
Status: |
01/27/2010-To
inactive file by unanimous consent. |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Watch |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
01/27/2010-A
INACTIVE FILE |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law requires the Department of Water Resources to convene an independent
technical panel to provide information to the department and the Legislature
on new demand management measures, technologies, and approaches. "Demand
management measures" means those water conservation measures, programs,
and incentives that prevent the waste of water and promote the reasonable and
efficient use and reuse of available supplies. This bill would require the
state to achieve a 20% reduction in urban per capita water use in California
by December 31, 2020. The state would be required to make incremental
progress towards this goal by reducing per capita water use by at least 10%
on or before December 31, 2015. The bill would require each urban retail
water supplier to develop urban water use targets and an interim urban water
use target, in accordance with specified requirements. The bill would require
agricultural water suppliers to implement efficient water management
practices. The bill would require the department, in consultation with other
state agencies, to develop a single standardized water use reporting form.
The bill, with certain exceptions, would condition eligibility for certain
water management grants or loans to urban water suppliers, beginning July 1,
2016, and agricultural water suppliers, beginning July 1, 2013, on the
implementation of water conservation requirements established by the bill.
The bill would repeal on July 1, 2016, an existing requirement that
conditions eligibility for certain water management grants or loans to an
urban water supplier on the implementation of certain water demand management
measures. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing
laws. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 145 |
De
Leon |
Motor
carriers: construction trucking services. |
||
|
|
Status: |
06/22/2010-In
committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author. |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Watch |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
06/16/2010-S
APPR. |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law requires the Department of Motor Vehicles to regulate the safe operation
of specified vehicles, including commercial motor vehicles and trailer and
semitrailer commercial vehicle combinations owned and operated by motor
carriers. Existing law also requires every motor carrier of property to
comply with specified safety, permit, and liability insurance regulations and
to pay the fees required by these provisions. This bill would apply this
prohibition to a broker of construction trucking services, as defined , and
would prohibit that broker from furnishing construction transportation
services to any construction project unless it has secured a surety bond of
not less than $15,000 that meets specified requirements. The bill would make
a broker of construction trucking services who violates these provisions
guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to a fine of up to $5,000 . This bill
contains other related provisions and other existing laws. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 300 |
Caballero |
Subdivisions:
water supply. |
||
|
|
Status: |
07/07/2009-In
committee: Set, first hearing. Testimony taken. Further hearing to be set. |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Watch |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
07/07/2009-S
N.R. & W. |
|||
|
Summary: |
The
Subdivision Map Act prohibits approval of a tentative map, or a parcel map
for which a tentative map was not required, or a development agreement for a
subdivision of property of more than 500 dwelling units, except as specified,
including the design of the subdivision or the type of improvement, unless
the legislative body of a city or county or the designated advisory agency
provides written verification from the applicable public water system that a
sufficient water supply is available or, in addition, a specified finding is
made by the local agency that sufficient water supplies are, or will be,
available prior to completion of the project. This bill would require, until
January 1, 2017, the public water system, or the local agency if there is no
public water system, to review, verify for accuracy, and approve, as
specified, the subdivider's water savings projections attributable to
voluntary demand management measures, as defined. The public water system
would be authorized to collect fees necessary to provide the additional
analysis of the voluntary demand management measures. This bill would provide
that a water supply assessment completed, as specified, satisfies the
existing requirement of verifying sufficient water supply, unless the public
water system receives specified new information . The public water system
would be required to determine the projected water savings attributable to
the voluntary demand management measures that will be incorporated into the
subdivision. The projected water savings would be required to be calculated
using specified data compiled or maintained by the public water system or the
water savings projections adopted by the California Urban Water Conservation
Council. If a project applicant proposes to use a new voluntary water demand
management measure for which neither the California Urban Water Conservation
Council nor the public water system has adopted an estimate or method to
calculate the projected water savings of the proposed voluntary demand
management measure, the projected water savings would be required to be made
based on documented methodologies or calculations submitted in the record.
Five years after the project has been fully developed, the public water
system would be required to include within its next urban water management
plan a report on the monitoring and compliance of voluntary water demand
management measures and to determine , if practicable based on readily available
information, whether they have resulted in the water savings necessary to
achieve the agreed upon water demand offsets. The bill would also require the
public water system to document the measured annual water use of the
subdivision in comparison to the projected demand associated with the
subdivision, and to calculate the water savings attributable to the voluntary
mitigation measures financed by the Voluntary Water Demand Mitigation Fund
for the subdivision. If the public water system bases its written
verification of a sufficient water supply for the subdivision, in whole or in
part, on the use of voluntary demand management measures within the
subdivision, the written verification would be required to be conditioned on
the maintenance and operation of the voluntary demand management measures, or
measures that are at least as water efficient, as agreed to by the applicant
and the public water system, and the recordation as a covenant running with
the land for the lots within the subdivision. The bill would provide that by
acceptance of a deed to a lot, each purchaser would acknowledge the
obligation to comply with the voluntary demand measures for the lot as
described in the covenant. These covenants would be authorized to be enforced
pursuant to the existing authority of a public water system. The bill would
further require a builder, prior to the close of escrow, to give a purchaser
information that would be required to be included in a maintenance manual
that informs the purchaser of the existence of the home's unique water saving
devices, including specified information. The bill would also encourage the
public water system to commit to carrying out the water conservation measures
funded by the Voluntary Water Demand Mitigation Fund within 24 months of the
sale of the last unit of the proposed subdivision. The bill would require the
public water system to choose water conservation measures that are themost
cost-effective means to yield water savings . The bill would authorize
expenditures from the fund to be made within the subdivision or elsewhere
within the service area of the public water supplier, at its discretion. Not
less than 40% of the proceeds from the voluntary water demand mitigation fund
would be required to be directed to water conservation programs in any
disadvantaged community, unless the public water system makes a specified
finding. By adding to the duties of the public water system, this bill would
impose a state-mandated local program. This bill contains other related
provisions and other existing laws. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 370 |
Eng |
Unlicensed
contractors. |
||
|
|
Status: |
10/11/2009-Chaptered
by the Secretary of State, Chapter Number 319, Statutes of 2009 |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Support |
|
|
Priority: |
1 |
||
|
Location: |
10/11/2009-A
CHAPTERED |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law, the Contractors' State License Law, provides for the licensure and
regulation of contractors by the Contractors' State License Board. Existing
law makes it a misdemeanor for a person to engage in the business or act in
the capacity of a contractor without having a license and makes a first
offense punishable by imprisonment in the county jail for no more than 6
months, or by a fine not exceeding $1,000, or both. Existing law requires a
court to impose upon a person who has been previously convicted of that
offense a fine of 20% of the price of the contract, as specified, or $4,500,
whichever is greater, and imprisonment in the county jail for at least 90 days,
except as specified. Existing law specifies that a 3rd or subsequent
conviction is punishable by a fine of not less than $4,500 nor more than the
greater of $10,000 or 20% of the contract price or by imprisonment in the
county jail, as specified, or both, and applies those penalty provisions to a
person who is named on a revoked license and is held responsible for the act
or omission resulting in the revocation. Existing law requires a court to
order a defendant convicted of a crime under those provisions, or under
provisions related to the offering or performance of repairs caused by a
natural disaster, to pay restitution to the victim, as specified. This bill
would make a first conviction punishable by a fine not exceeding $5,000 or by
imprisonment in a county jail for no more than 6 months, as specified, or
both. The bill would require that the fine for a 2nd conviction be the
greater of 20% of the contract price, 20% of the aggregate payments made to,
or at the direction of, the unlicensed contractor, or $5,000. In addition,
the bill would require that a 3rd or subsequent conviction be punishable by
both a fine and imprisonment in a county jail, as specified, and would
require that the fine be no less than $5,000 and no more than the greater of
$10,000, 20% of the contract price, or 20% of the aggregate payments made to,
or at the direction of, the unlicensed contractor. By requiring 3rd or
subsequent convictions to be punishable by imprisonment in a county jail, the
bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Under the provisions
described above, the bill would also provide that a person who used the
services of an unlicensed contractor is a victim of crime and eligible for
restitution for economic losses, regardless of whether that person had knowledge
that the contractor was unlicensed. This bill contains other related
provisions and other existing laws. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 396 |
Fuentes |
Works of
improvement: liens. |
||
|
|
Status: |
01/31/2010-Failed
Deadline pursuant to Rule 61(b)(3). (Last location was 2 YEAR on 6/2/2009) |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Support |
|
|
Priority: |
2 |
||
|
Location: |
01/31/2010-A
DEAD |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law provides that all persons and laborers of every class, except for an
original contractor, performing labor upon, bestowing skill or other
necessary services on, furnishing materials or leasing equipment to be used
or consumed in, or furnishing appliances, teams, or power contributing to, a
public work of improvement may serve a stop notice upon the public entity
responsible for the public work, as specified. Existing law imposes a duty on
a public entity to withhold money or bonds due or to become due to the
original contractor in an amount sufficient to answer the claim stated in the
stop notice and to provide for the public entity' s reasonable cost of any
litigation on the matter, as specified. This bill would qualify the
requirement that the public entity withhold money or bonds sufficient to provide
for reasonable litigation costs to make it applicable only if the original
contractor fails to promptly accept a tender of defense of the public entity
in the litigation. This bill contains other related provisions and other
existing laws. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 410 |
De La
Torre |
Recycled
water. |
||
|
|
Status: |
10/26/2009-(Corrected
October 26.) In committee: Held under submission. |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Support |
|
|
Priority: |
2 |
||
|
Location: |
08/27/2009-S
APPR. SUSPENSE FILE |
|||
|
Summary: |
Under
existing law, the Safe Drinking Water, Water Quality and Supply, Flood
Control, River and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2006, an initiative bond
act approved by the voters at the November 7, 2006, statewide general
election, authorizes the issuance of bonds in the amount of $5,388,000,000,
of which $1,000,000,000 is made available to the department for grants for
projects that assist local public agencies to meet the long-term water needs of
the state, to be allocated to the state's hydrologic regions in accordance
with a prescribed schedule. This bill would require the department, in
providing grants to those hydrologic regions, to give additional
consideration to proposals for the preparation of salt and nutrient
management plans consistent with the recycled water policy of the State Water
Resources Control Board. This bill contains other related provisions and
other existing laws. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 474 |
Blumenfield |
Contractual
assessments: water efficiency improvements. |
||
|
|
Status: |
10/11/2009-Chaptered
by the Secretary of State, Chapter Number 444, Statutes of 2009 |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Support |
|
|
Priority: |
2 |
||
|
Location: |
10/11/2009-A
CHAPTERED |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law authorizes the legislative body of any city, defined as a city, county,
or city and county, to determine that it would be convenient and advantageous
to designate an area within which authorized city officials and free and
willing property owners may enter into contractual assessments and make
arrangements to finance public improvements to specified lots or parcels or
to finance the installation of distributed generation renewable energy
sources or energy efficiency improvements that are permanently fixed to real
property, as specified. Existing law requires the legislative body to make
these determinations by adopting a resolution indicating its intention to do
so and requires the resolution to include certain specified information. This
bill would expand these provisions to authorize the legislative body of any
public agency, as defined, to determine that it would be in the public
interest to designate an area within which authorized city officials and free
and willing property owners may enter into contractual assessments to finance
the installation of water efficiency improvements that are permanently fixed
to real property, as specified. The bill would also, with respect to all of
its provisions, modify its definitions and require a legislative body to
perform additional record keeping duties and provide specified notice to any
entity that provides energy or water within the boundaries of the area within
which contractual assessments may be entered into. This bill would also
require additional specified disclosures for a transfer of real property
subject to a contractual assessment. The bill would declare the intent of the
Legislature in regard to these provisions. This bill would make technical, nonsubstantive
changes to these provisions. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 479 |
Chesbro |
Solid
waste: diversion. |
||
|
|
Status: |
08/27/2009-In
committee: Held under submission. |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Watch |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
08/27/2009-S
APPR. SUSPENSE FILE |
|||
|
Summary: |
The
California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989, which is administered by
the California Integrated Waste Management Board, requires each city, county,
and regional agency, if any, to develop a source reduction and recycling
element of an integrated waste management plan containing specified
components, including a source reduction component, a recycling component,
and a composting component. With certain exceptions, the source reduction and
recycling element of that plan is required to divert 50% of all solid waste
from landfill disposal or transformation by January 1, 2000, through source
reduction, recycling, and composting activities. This bill would require the
board, on January 1, 2020, and annually thereafter, to ensure that 75% of all
solid waste generated is source reduced, recycled, and composted. The bill
would prohibit the board from imposing any enforceable requirements against a
local agency or a solid waste enterprise or that includes aspects of solid
waste handling that are of local concern to implement this 75% diversion
level. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 482 |
Mendoza |
Employment:
credit reports. |
||
|
|
Status: |
06/29/2010-Do
pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Watch |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
06/30/2010-S
APPR. |
|||
|
Summary: |
The
federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) and the state Consumer Credit
Reporting Agencies Act define and regulate consumer credit reports and
authorize the use of consumer credit reports for employment purposes,
pursuant to specified requirements. The FCRA provides that it does not
preempt state law, except as specifically provided or to the extent that
state laws are inconsistent with its provisions. This bill would prohibit an
employer, with the exception of certain financial institutions, from
obtaining a consumer credit report for employment purposes unless the
information is (1) substantially job-related, meaning that the position of
the person for whom the report is sought has access to money, other assets,
or confidential information, and (2) the position of the person for whom the
report is sought is a position in the state Department of Justice, a
managerial position, that of a sworn peace officer or other law enforcement
position, or a position for which the information contained in the report is
required to be disclosed by law or to be obtained by the employer. This bill
contains other existing laws. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 484 |
Eng |
Franchise
Tax Board: professional or occupational licenses. |
||
|
|
Status: |
01/15/2010-Failed
Deadline pursuant to Rule 61(b)(1). (Last location was 2 YEAR on 5/1/2009) |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Oppose |
|
|
Priority: |
2 |
||
|
Location: |
01/15/2010-A
DEAD |
|||
|
Summary: |
The
Personal Income Tax Law and the Bank and Corporation Tax Law impose taxes on,
or measured by, income. Existing law allows a tax return or return
information filed under those laws to be disclosed in a judicial or
administrative proceeding pertaining to tax administration under certain
circumstances. Existing law requires every board, as defined under the
Business and Professions Code, and the Department of Insurance to, upon
request of the Franchise Tax Board, furnish to the Franchise Tax Board
certain information with respect to every licensee. Existing law authorizes
many of these boards to impose fees on its licensees to cover its costs in
administering its respective provisions and in some cases these funds are
deposited into continuously appropriated funds. This bill would require a
state governmental licensing entity, as defined, issuing professional or
occupational licenses, certificates, registrations, or permits to provide to
the Franchise Tax Board the name and social security number or federal
taxpayer identification number of each individual licensee of that entity.
The bill would require the Franchise Tax Board, if a licensee fails to pay
taxes for which a notice of state tax lien has been recorded, as specified,
to mail a preliminary notice of suspension to the licensee. The bill would
provide that the license of a licensee who fails to satisfy the unpaid taxes
by a certain date shall be automatically suspended, except as specified,
would require the Franchise Tax Board to provide a notice of suspension to
the applicable state governmental licensing entity and to mail a notice of
suspension to the licensee, and would provide that the suspension be canceled
upon compliance with the tax obligation. The bill would require the Franchise
Tax Board to meet certain requirements and would make related changes. The
bill would authorize a state governmental licensing entity, as specified, to
impose a fee on a licensee with a suspended license in an amount necessary to
cover its administrative costs. The bill would make implementation of its
provisions contingent upon appropriation of funds for that purpose in the
annual Budget Act. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 569 |
Emmerson |
Meal periods:
exemptions. |
||
|
|
Status: |
06/24/2010-From
committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes
0.) (June 23). |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Watch |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
06/24/2010-S
APPR. |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law prohibits, subject to certain exceptions, an employer from requiring an
employee to work more than 5 hours per day without providing a meal period
and, notwithstanding that provision, authorizes the Industrial Welfare
Commission to adopt a working condition order permitting a meal period to
commence after 6 hours of work if the order is consistent with the health and
welfare of affected employees. This bill would exempt from these provisions
employees in a construction occupation, commercial drivers in the
transportation industry, employees in the security services industry employed
as security officers , and employees of electrical and gas corporations or
local publicly owned electric utilities, as defined, if those employees are
covered by a valid collective bargaining agreement containing specified
terms, including meal period provisions. It would specify that its provisions
do not affect the requirements for meal periods for certain other employees
or employers. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 765 |
Caballero |
Income
tax: credit: purchase: principal residence. |
||
|
|
Status: |
09/11/2009-From
THIRD READING: To INACTIVE FILE. |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Watch |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
09/11/2009-S
THIRD READING |
|||
|
Summary: |
The
Personal Income Tax Law authorizes a credit against the taxes imposed by that
law in an amount equal to the lesser of 5% of the purchase price or $10,000
in the case of the purchase of a qualified principal residence on and after
March 1, 2009, and before March 1, 2010, but not to exceed an aggregate
limitation of $100,000,000 for all credits allowable. Existing law requires a
certification that the residence has never been occupied be provided to the
Franchise Tax Board within one week of the sale of the qualified principal
residence. This bill would limit the credit to taxpayers who purchased a
qualified principal residence on and after March 1, 2009, and before July 3,
2009, and on and after the effective date of this bill and before March 1,
2010. This bill would also require the aggregate limitation of credits to be
reduced by a specified amount per certification received by the Franchise Tax
Board. This bill contains other related provisions. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 969 |
Calderon,
Charles |
Recycled
water. |
||
|
|
Status: |
01/15/2010-Failed
Deadline pursuant to Rule 61(b)(1). (Last location was 2 YEAR on 5/1/2009) |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Support |
|
|
Priority: |
2 |
||
|
Location: |
01/15/2010-A
DEAD |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law, the Water Recycling Act of 1991, establishes a statewide goal to recycle
a total of 700,000 acre-feet of water per year by the year 2000 and 1,000,000
acre-feet of water per year by the year 2010. The act requires, to the extent
that specified funds are made available, the Department of Water Resources to
identify and report to the Legislature on opportunities for increasing the
use of recycled water and constraints and impediments to increasing the use
of recycled water. The act requires the department to convene a task force,
known as the 2002 Recycled Water Task Force, to advise the department in
implementing the report requirement. Existing law requires the department and
the task force to report to the Legislature no later than July 1, 2003. This
bill would repeal the report and task force requirements. The bill would
change the statewide goal for recycled water to an unspecified number of
acre-feet of water per year by the year 2020. The bill also would make changes
to findings and declarations under the act. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 1000 |
Ma |
Employment:
paid sick days. |
||
|
|
Status: |
01/31/2010-Failed
Deadline pursuant to Rule 61(b)(3). (Last location was 2 YEAR on 6/2/2009) |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Oppose |
|
|
Priority: |
2 |
||
|
Location: |
01/31/2010-A
DEAD |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law authorizes employers to provide their employees paid sick leave. This
bill would provide that an employee who works in California for 7 or more
days in a calendar year is entitled to paid sick days, as defined, which
shall be accrued at a rate of no less than one hour for every 30 hours
worked. An employee would be entitled to use accrued sick days beginning on
the 90th calendar day of employment. The bill would require employers to
provide paid sick days, upon the request of the employee, for diagnosis,
care, or treatment of health conditions of the employee or an employee's
family member, or for leave related to domestic violence or sexual assault.
An employer would be prohibited from discriminating or retaliating against an
employee who requests paid sick days. The bill would require employers to
satisfy specified posting and notice and recordkeeping requirements. The bill
would also make conforming changes. This bill contains other related
provisions. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 1074 |
Conway |
Contractors:
fraudulent license numbers. |
||
|
|
Status: |
07/14/2009-In
committee: Set, first hearing. Testimony taken. Further hearing to be set. |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Support |
|
|
Priority: |
1 |
||
|
Location: |
07/14/2009-S
PUB. S. |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law provides that it is a crime if a person willfully and intentionally uses,
with the intent to defraud, a contractor's license number that does not
correspond to the number on a currently valid contractor's license held by
that person. This bill would instead provide that it is a crime if a person
willfully and intentionally uses, with the intent to defraud, any number that
does not correspond to the number on a currently valid contractor's license
held by that person. This bill contains other related provisions and other
existing laws. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 1119 |
Emmerson |
Works of
improvement: payments. |
||
|
|
Status: |
01/22/2010-Failed
Deadline pursuant to Rule 61(b)(2). (Last location was 2 YEAR on 6/8/2009) |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Support |
|
|
Priority: |
1 |
||
|
Location: |
01/22/2010-A
DEAD |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law requires an owner of a private work of improvement to release retention
proceeds withheld from any payment within 45 days after the date of
completion. Existing law requires a public entity to release retention
proceeds withheld from any payment by the public entity within 60 days after
the date of completion. Existing law requires an original contractor to pay
any subcontractor within 10 days from the time that all or any portion of
retention proceeds are received by the original contractor. Existing law
requires an original contractor or subcontractor to pay any subcontractor
within 10 days from the time of receipt of each progress payment, unless
otherwise agreed to in writing. Existing law imposes a penalty of 2% on the
amount due per month on funds that are improperly withheld in a contract
dispute relating to public and private works of improvement, as specified.
This bill would state the intent of the Legislature to reconsider prompt
payment statutes regarding public and private works of improvement to aid in
their clarity and application . This bill contains other existing laws. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 1288 |
Fong |
Employment:
hiring practices: electronic employment verification. |
||
|
|
Status: |
10/11/2009-Vetoed
by the Governor |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Support |
|
|
Priority: |
2 |
||
|
Location: |
10/11/2009-A
VETOED |
|||
|
Summary: |
The
E-Verify Program of the United States Department of Homeland Security, in
partnership with the United States Social Security Administration, enables
participating employers to use the program, on a voluntary basis, to verify
that the employees they hire are authorized to work in the United States. The
bill would prohibit the state, or a city, county, city and county, or special
district, from requiring an employer other than one of those government
entities to use an electronic employment verification system except when
required by federal law or as a condition of receiving federal funds. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 1409 |
John
A. Perez |
Public
contracts: county highways: work authorizations. |
||
|
|
Status: |
02/02/2010-Joint
Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 1756.) In committee: Hearing
postponed by committee. (Refers to 7/16/2009 hearing) |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Support |
|
|
Priority: |
2 |
||
|
Location: |
07/15/2009-S
T. & H. |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law sets forth procedures pursuant to which work being done by contract on
county highways may be done. Existing law specifies that in any county that
has appointed a road commissioner, or in any county that has abolished the
office of road commissioner, as prescribed, the board of supervisors of the
county may authorize the road commissioner, or a registered civil engineer
under the direction of the county director of transportation, to have any
work upon county highways done under his or her supervision and direction. In
this connection, existing law provides that the work on those contracts may
be done by: (1) letting a contract covering both work and material, as
provided; (2) purchasing the material and letting a contract for the
performance of the work, as provided; or (3) purchasing the material and
having the work done by day labor, in which case advertising for bids is not
required. This bill would revise that provision authorizing the work on those
county highway contracts to be done by (1) purchasing the material and having
the work done by day labor, as defined, only after advertising and requesting
bids, as provided, and the board passing a resolution making a specified
finding; or (2) purchasing the material and having the work done by specified
employees, as defined . |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 1523 |
Calderon,
Charles |
Sales and
use taxes: exemption: fixed price contract. |
||
|
|
Status: |
01/31/2010-Failed
Deadline pursuant to Rule 61(b)(3). (Last location was 2 YEAR on 6/8/2009) |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Support |
|
|
Priority: |
1 |
||
|
Location: |
01/31/2010-A
DEAD |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law imposes a state sales and use tax on retailers and on the storage, use,
or other consumption of tangible personal property in this state at the
combined rate of 7 1/4 % of the gross receipts from the retail sale of tangible
personal property in this state and of the sales price of tangible personal
property purchased from any retailer for storage, use, or other consumption
in this state. This bill would, during the period of the imposition of a 1%
sales and use tax increase commencing on April 1, 2009 , exclude from that 1%
rate of tax, the gross receipts from certain sales and uses of tangible
personal property that are subject to a fixed price pursuant to a contract
entered into prior to April 1, 2009 . This bill contains other related
provisions. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 1693 |
Ma |
Building
standards: code adoption cycle. |
||
|
|
Status: |
06/30/2010-Read
second time. To Consent Calendar. |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Watch |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
06/30/2010-S
CONSENT CALENDAR |
|||
|
Summary: |
The
California Building Standards Law provides for the promulgation of building
standards by state agencies by requiring all state agencies that adopt or
propose adoption of any building standard to submit the building standard to
the California Building Standards Commission for approval or adoption.
Existing law requires that the commission receive proposed building standards
from state agencies for consideration in an annual code adoption cycle. This
bill would modify the code adoption cycle and extend it to 18 months. This
bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 1774 |
Saldana |
Recycled
water: state agency landscape irrigation. |
||
|
|
Status: |
06/22/2010-In
committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author. |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Support
if Amended |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
06/10/2010-S
N.R. & W. |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law sets forth legislative findings and declarations stating that the use of
potable domestic water for the irrigation of residential landscaping is a
waste or unreasonable use of water if recycled water is available for that
use, as determined by the State Water Resources Control Board. Existing law
authorizes a public agency to require the use of recycled water for the
irrigation of residential landscaping if recycled water is available for that
use, as determined by the board, and other requirements are met. This bill
would state legislative findings and declarations that the use of potable
domestic water for the irrigation of landscaping generally is a waste or an
unreasonable use of water if recycled water is available for that use, as
determined by the board. The bill would authorize a public agency, including
local public agencies, to require a state agency whose property is located
within the jurisdiction of the public agency to use recycled water for landscape
irrigation of the property of that state agency if certain requirements are
met. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 1793 |
Saldana |
Common
interest developments: artificial turf. |
||
|
|
Status: |
06/17/2010-Read
second time. To third reading. |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Watch |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
06/17/2010-S
THIRD READING |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law requires a local agency to adopt a specified updated model ordinance
regarding water-efficient landscapes or a water-efficient landscape ordinance
that is at least as effective in conserving water as the updated model
ordinance. Existing law allows certain water providers to take specified
actions regarding water conservation. This bill would provide that a
provision of any of the governing documents of a common interest development
would be void and unenforceable if it prohibits, or includes conditions that
have the effect of prohibiting, the use of artificial turf or any other
synthetic surface that resembles grass. This prohibition would not prohibit
an association from applying landscape rules and regulations established in
governing documents that establish design standards and quality standards for
the installation of artificial turf, or any other synthetic surface that
resembles grass, to the extent the rules and regulations do not prohibit the
use of artificial turf or any other synthetic surface that resembles grass.
This bill contains other existing laws. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 1834 |
Solorio |
Rainwater
Capture Act of 2010. |
||
|
|
Status: |
06/28/2010-Do
pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Support |
|
|
Priority: |
1 |
||
|
Location: |
06/28/2010-S
APPR. |
|||
|
Summary: |
(1)
Under existing law, the State Water Resources Control Board and the
California regional water quality control boards prescribe waste discharge
requirements for the discharge of stormwater in accordance with the national
pollutant discharge elimination system (NPDES) permit program and the
Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act. Existing law authorizes a regional
water management group, as defined, to adopt an integrated regional water
management plan that addresses specified matters. Existing law authorizes a
city, county, or special district to develop, jointly or individually,
stormwater resource plans that meet certain standards. This bill would enact
the Rainwater Capture Act of 2010, which would authorize a landowner to
install, maintain, and operate, on the landowner's property, a rainwater
capture system meeting specified requirements. The bill would require the
State Water Resources Control Board to initiate a stakeholder process to
develop recommendations for policies for state and local agencies to
encourage and facilitate the installation and use of rainwater capture
systems, as defined, for specified nonpotable uses, and capture of stormwater
by public agencies. The bill would require the board to publish those
recommendations on its Internet Web site by December 31, 2011. The bill would
require the board, if the stakeholder process results in recommendations for
building standards, to submit those recommendations to the California Building
Standards Commission and the Department of Housing and Community Development
by December 31, 2011, and would require the commission and the department to
consider the recommendations for building standards for adoption in a
specified update of the California Building Standards Code by July 1, 2013.
This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 1853 |
Huffman |
Public
contracts: bid preferences: employee health care expenditures. |
||
|
|
Status: |
06/30/2010-From
committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes
1.) (June 29). |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Oppose |
|
|
Priority: |
1 |
||
|
Location: |
06/30/2010-S
APPR. |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law imposes various requirements with respect to contracting by public
entities. This bill would require a state agency awarding a public works
contract to provide a 2% bid preference to a bidder or subcontractor meeting
specified criteria related to providing employee health care coverage . This
bill would require a bidder and its subcontractors to submit statements
certifying that they qualify for the bid preference, would require the bidder
and contractors to continue to make employee health care expenditures, as
specified, and would impose civil penalties in connection therewith, as
provided. This bill would become operative on January 1, 2012, and would not
apply to contracts advertised for bid on or after January 1, 2017 . |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 1973 |
Swanson |
Income
taxes: credits: qualified employees. |
||
|
|
Status: |
07/01/2010-From
committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes
0.) (July 1). |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Watch |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
07/01/2010-S
APPR. |
|||
|
Summary: |
The
Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law authorize various credits
against the taxes imposed by those laws, including a credit for taxable years
beginning on or after January 1, 2009, in the amount of $3,000 for each
full-time employee hired by a qualified employer. Those laws define
"qualified employer" as a taxpayer that employed 20 or fewer
employees as of the last day of the preceding taxable year. This bill would,
under both laws, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2011,
authorize a credit in the amount of $5,000 for each full-time employee who is
either an ex-offender, or a person who has been unemployed for 12 or more
consecutive months, as specified. This bill contains other related
provisions. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 1975 |
Fong |
Water
charges and meters: multiunit structures. |
||
|
|
Status: |
06/29/2010-From
committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on RLS. Re-referred. (Ayes 6. Noes
3.) (June 29). |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Watch |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
06/29/2010-S
RLS. |
|||
|
Summary: |
The
Water Measurement Law requires every water purveyor to require, as a
condition of new water service on and after January 1, 1992, the installation
of a water meter to measure water service. That law also requires urban water
suppliers to install water meters on specified service connections, and to charge
water users based on the actual volume of deliveries as measured by those
water meters in accordance with a certain timetable. This bill , contingent
upon adoption by the California Building Standards Commission of specified
building standards, would require that architectural plans for individual
dwelling units in certain multiunit structures, for which a building permit
application is submitted on or after January 1, 2013, include, as a condition
for the issuance of the building permit, the installation of either a water
meter or a submeter, at the discretion of the water purveyor, with a
specified exception, to measure water supplied to each individual dwelling
unit. The bill would require the owner of the structure to ensure that a
water submeter installed for these purposes complies with laws and
regulations governing installation, certification, maintenance, billing, and
testing of water submeters. The bill would prohibit a water purveyor from
imposing specified fees related to the installation of water meters and
submeters and would prohibit the owner of the structure, or an association
managing the structure, from assessing or collecting fees related to the
water meters and submeters, from the occupants of the structure . This bill
contains other related provisions and other existing laws. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 2036 |
Berryhill,
Bill |
Public
contracts: contract document distribution. |
||
|
|
Status: |
06/29/2010-Withdrawn
from committee. Re-referred to Com. on RLS. |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Watch |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
06/29/2010-S
RLS. |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law imposes various requirements with respect to contracting by public
agencies. This bill would require an officer, department, board, or
commission, taking bids for the construction of a public work or improvement,
to distribute contract documents, as specified, to a prospective bidder,
subcontractor bidder, supplier, and contractor plan room service, as
prescribed. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 2038 |
Eng |
Franchise
Tax Board: professional or occupational licenses. |
||
|
|
Status: |
06/04/2010-Failed
Deadline pursuant to Rule 61(b)(11). (Last location was APPR. SUSPENSE FILE
on 5/28/2010) |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Oppose
Unless Amended |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
06/04/2010-A
DEAD |
|||
|
Summary: |
The
Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law impose taxes on, or
measured by, income. Existing law allows a tax return or return information
filed under those laws to be disclosed in a judicial or administrative
proceeding pertaining to tax administration under certain circumstances.
Existing law requires every board, as defined under the Business and
Professions Code, and the Department of Insurance to, upon request of the
Franchise Tax Board, furnish to the Franchise Tax Board certain information
with respect to every licensee. This bill would , beginning January 1, 2012,
and ending January 1, 2016, permit a state governmental licensing entity,
that issues professional or occupational licenses, certificates,
registrations, or permits, to suspend, revoke, or refuse to issue a license
where the applicant or licensee has failed to pay income taxes, subject to
specified procedures. This bill would also require those licensing entities
to provide to the Franchise Tax Board the name and social security number or
federal taxpayer identification number of each individual licensee of that
entity. The bill would , beginning January 1, 2012, and ending January 1,
2016, require the Franchise Tax Board, if an individual licensee fails to pay
taxes for which a notice of state tax lien has been recorded, as specified,
when the specified licensing entities fail to make a decision regarding
suspension or revocation of the license, to send a notice of suspension to
the licensee. The bill would provide that the license of a licensee who fails
to satisfy the unpaid taxes by a certain date shall be automatically suspended,
except as specified, and would require the Franchise Tax Board to mail a
notice of suspension to the applicable state governmental licensing entity
and to the licensee, and would provide that the suspension be canceled upon
compliance with the tax obligation. The bill would require the Franchise Tax
Board to meet certain requirements and would make related changes. This bill
contains other related provisions and other existing laws. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 2060 |
Calderon,
Charles |
Sales and
use taxes: exemption: fixed price contract. |
||
|
|
Status: |
07/01/2010-Do
pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations. |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Support |
|
|
Priority: |
1 |
||
|
Location: |
07/01/2010-S
APPR. |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law imposes a state sales and use tax on retailers and on the storage, use,
or other consumption of tangible personal property in this state at the
combined rate of 81/4% of the gross receipts from the retail sale of tangible
personal property in this state and of the sales price of tangible personal
property purchased from any retailer for storage, use, or other consumption
in this state that is stored, used, or otherwise consumed in this state. This
bill would, for any increase in the state sales and use tax rate that occurs
on or after the effective date of this bill, exclude from that increased rate
of tax, the sale of, and the storage, use or other consumption in this state
of, tangible personal property that is subject to a fixed price contract
under specified circumstances entered into prior to the operative date of the
state sales and use tax rate increase, as provided. This bill contains other
related provisions. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 2075 |
Committee
on Higher Education |
Public
contracts: California State University: bidding procedures. |
||
|
|
Status: |
06/30/2010-Read
second time. To Consent Calendar. |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Watch |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
06/30/2010-S
CONSENT CALENDAR |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law authorizes the trustees of the California State University to enter into
contracts for public works projects, as provided. Existing law requires the
trustees, for certain contracts estimated to exceed the value of a minor
capital outlay project, to obtain financial information from prospective
bidders by means of a standard form questionnaire and financial statement.
Existing law prohibits the trustees from furnishing proposal forms to any
person who is required to submit and has not submitted a questionnaire and
financial statement for prequalification at least 5 days prior to the date
fixed for publicly opening sealed bids and been prequalified for at least one
day prior to that date. This bill would revise that requirement by changing
the time in which a person has to submit the questionnaire and financial
statement for prequalification to 10 business days prior to the date fixed
for publicly opening sealed bids and require any person to have been
prequalified for at least one business day prior to that date . |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 2130 |
Huber |
Professions
and vocations: sunset review. |
||
|
|
Status: |
06/30/2010-Withdrawn
from committee. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Watch |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
06/30/2010-S
APPR. |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law establishes the Joint Committee on Boards, Commissions, and Consumer
Protection and, until January 1, 2012, requires the committee to hold public
hearings at specified times and to evaluate whether a board or regulatory
program has demonstrated a need for its continued existence. Existing law
states the intent of the Legislature that all existing and proposed state
boards be subject to review every 4 years to evaluate and determine whether
each has demonstrated a public need for its continued existence, as
specified. This bill would abolish the Joint Committee on Boards, Commissions,
and Consumer Protection and make other conforming changes . This bill
contains other related provisions and other existing laws. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 2137 |
Chesbro |
Fertilizing
material: labels. |
||
|
|
Status: |
06/30/2010-Read
second time. To third reading. |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Watch |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
06/30/2010-S
THIRD READING |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law generally regulates fertilizing materials, as defined, including the
labeling of fertilizing materials. Existing law defines "label" and
"labeling" for purposes of these provisions. This bill would, until
January 1, 2014, provide that "label" and "labeling" do not
include a certified laboratory analysis, as defined, showing the nutrient
contents of compost, cocompost, or mulch, as defined, if the laboratory
analysis documentation contains a specified statement and other information ,
as provided. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 2181 |
Hagman |
State
Contract Act: contracting by state agencies. |
||
|
|
Status: |
06/22/2010-From
committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes
0.) (June 22). |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Watch |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
06/22/2010-S
APPR. |
|||
|
Summary: |
The
State Contract Act requires projects that are not under the jurisdiction of
specified departments to be under the charge and control of the Department of
Transportation. This bill would instead have those projects under the charge
and control of the Department of General Services. This bill contains other
related provisions and other existing laws. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 2184 |
Arambula |
Public
contracts: local agency: alternative bidding procedures: notice. |
||
|
|
Status: |
06/30/2010-Enrolled
and to the Governor at 11:15 a.m. |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Watch |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
06/30/2010-A
ENROLLED |
|||
|
Summary: |
The
Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act provides for alternative
bidding procedures for public projects let by contract by a public agency
when the public agency has voluntarily elected to become subject to the
accounting procedures set forth in that law. That law sets forth publishing
requirements for notices inviting formal bids to let contracts, including a
requirement to mail the notice to all construction trade journals at least 30
calendar days before the date of opening the bids. This bill would also
require the notice to be sent electronically, if available, by either
facsimile or electronic mail to all construction trade journals, and would
require notice to be sent at least 15 calendar days before the date of
opening the bids. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 2216 |
Fuentes |
Works of
improvement. |
||
|
|
Status: |
06/30/2010-From
committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on RLS. Re-referred. (Ayes 3. Noes
1.) (June 29). |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Oppose
Unless Amended |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
06/30/2010-S
RLS. |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law requires that, for private and public works of improvement, and in a
public works contract, a prime contractor or subcontractor pay to any
subcontractor, not later than 10 days after receipt of each progress payment,
unless otherwise agreed to in writing, the respective amount allowed the
contractor on account of the work performed by the subcontractors, to the
extent of each contractor's interest therein, as prescribed. This bill would,
instead, require that those amounts be paid not later than 7 days after
receipt of each progress payment. This bill contains other related provisions
and other existing laws. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 2305 |
Knight |
Contractors:
workers' compensation insurance coverage. |
||
|
|
Status: |
07/01/2010-Read
second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Watch |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
07/01/2010-S
APPR. |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law requires private employers to secure the payment of compensation by
obtaining and maintaining workers' compensation insurance or to self-insure
as an individual employer or as one employer in a group of employers. The
Contractors' State License Law requires every licensed contractor to have on
file at all times with the Contractors' State License Board a current and
valid Certificate of Workers' Compensation Insurance or Certification of
Self-Insurance, or a statement certifying that he or she has no employees and
is not required to obtain or maintain workers' compensation insurance
coverage. Existing law, until January 1, 2011, requires a contractor with a
C-39 roofing classification to obtain and maintain workers' compensation
insurance even if he or she has no employees. Failure to comply with this
requirement results in the automatic suspension of the license. However, with
respect to a license that was active on January 1, 2007, and included a C-39
roofing classification, existing law, until January 1, 2011, requires the
registrar of contractors, in lieu of suspending the license, to remove the
C-39 roofing classification from the license if the contractor does not have
workers' compensation insurance coverage. This bill would extend the
operation of those provisions until January 1, 2013 , with respect to a
license that is active on January 1, 2011, with a C-39 roofing
classification. The bill would require the suspension of any license that,
after January 1, 2011, is active and has had the C-39 roofing classification
removed, of the licensee is found by the registrar of contractors to have
employees and to lack a valid Certificate of Workers' Compensation Insurance
or Certification of Self-Insurance. This bill contains other related
provisions and other existing laws. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 2332 |
Eng |
Contractors:
licenses. |
||
|
|
Status: |
06/29/2010-From
committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes
2.) (June 28). |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Watch |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
06/29/2010-S
APPR. |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law, the Contractors' State License Law, provides for the licensure and
regulation of contractors by the Contractors' State License Board within the
Department of Consumer Affairs. Existing law provides that the board may
refuse to issue, reinstate, reactivate, or renew a license or may suspend a
license for the failure of a licensee to resolve all outstanding final
liabilities, which include taxes, additions to tax, penalties, interest, and
any fees that may be assessed by the board, the Department of Industrial
Relations, the Employment Development Department, or the Franchise Tax Board.
This bill would also authorize the board to take the actions specified above
for a licensee's failure to resolve outstanding final liabilities assessed by
the Board of Equalization. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 2340 |
Monning |
Employee's
right to bereavement leave. |
||
|
|
Status: |
06/24/2010-From
committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 4. Noes
1.) (June 23). |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Watch |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
06/24/2010-S
APPR. |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law provides employees with the right to take time off work without discharge
or discrimination for a number of reasons. This bill would add the right to
inquire about, request, and take time off for bereavement leave. The
provisions of the bill would not apply to an employee who is covered by a valid
collective bargaining agreement that provides for bereavement leave and other
specified working conditions. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 2364 |
Nava |
Unemployment
insurance: benefits: good cause to leave work. |
||
|
|
Status: |
06/24/2010-From
committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 4. Noes
1.) (June 23). |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Watch |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
06/24/2010-S
APPR. |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law provides for unemployment compensation benefits to eligible individuals
who are unemployed through no fault of their own. Existing law authorizes any
employer who is entitled to receive specified notice of an unemployment
claim, to, within 10 days after mailing of the notice, submit to the
Employment Development Department specified facts disclosing whether the
claimant for benefits left the employer's employ voluntarily and with good
cause under certain circumstances, including, among other things, that the
claimant left the employer's employ to protect his or her children or himself
or herself from domestic violence abuse. This bill would revise various
provisions governing eligibility for unemployment compensation benefits to
specify that a claimant is eligible for benefits where he or she left an
employer's employ to protect his or her family from domestic violence abuse.
By increasing the number of persons who may be eligible to receive
unemployment compensation benefits, thereby providing for increased amounts payable
from the Unemployment Insurance Fund, the bill would make an appropriation.
This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 2390 |
Buchanan |
Public
works projects: bidding practices: licenses and workers' compensation
insurance. |
||
|
|
Status: |
06/30/2010-From
committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes
1.) (June 29). |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Watch |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
06/30/2010-S
APPR. |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law requires a public entity, the University of California, and the
California State University to specify for inclusion in any plans and notice
prepared for a public project the classification of the contractor's license,
which a contractor is required to possess at the time a contract is awarded.
This bill would, instead, require the contractor to possess that license at
the time the contractor makes a bid or offer to perform the work, and would
also require a contractor to possess current workers' compensation insurance
at that time. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing
laws. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 2409 |
Nestande |
Urban
water suppliers: water shortage contingency analysis. |
||
|
|
Status: |
06/23/2010-Enrolled
and to the Governor at 2:30 p.m. |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Watch |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
06/23/2010-A
ENROLLED |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law, the Urban Water Management Planning Act, requires an urban water
supplier, as defined, to prepare and adopt an urban water management plan for
submission to the Department of Water Resources and other entities, in
accordance with prescribed requirements. The act requires each urban water
supplier to update its urban water management plan at least once every 5
years on or before December 31, in years ending in 5 and zero. The act
requires an urban water management plan to include, among other things, an
urban water shortage contingency analysis. The urban water shortage
contingency analysis is required to include various elements relating to
water supply availability during water shortages and interruptions. This
bill, commencing with the urban water management plan update due on December
31, 2015, would require an urban water supplier, for purposes of developing a
water shortage contingency analysis, to analyze and define water features
that are artificially supplied with water, including ponds, lakes,
waterfalls, and fountains, separately from swimming pools and spas, as
defined. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 2419 |
Cook |
Contractors. |
||
|
|
Status: |
06/30/2010-Read
second time. To third reading. |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Watch |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
06/30/2010-S
THIRD READING |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law, the Contractors' State License Law, provides for the licensure and
regulation of contractors by the Contractors' State License Board. This bill
would rename that law the Contractors State License Law and would rename the
board the Contractors State License Board. The bill would rename specified
classifications of contractors, and would make other technical,
nonsubstantive, and conforming changes to related provisions. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 2494 |
Blumenfield |
Personal
services contracts. |
||
|
|
Status: |
06/30/2010-From
committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes
1.) (June 29). |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Watch |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
06/30/2010-S
APPR. |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law authorizes state agencies to use personal services contracts if specified
standards are satisfied, including, among other things, the contract does not
cause the displacement of civil service employees and the contract is awarded
through a publicized, competitive bidding process. The State Personnel Board
is required to review a proposed contract upon the request of an employee
organization for compliance with those standards. This bill would require a
state agency to immediately discontinue a contract disapproved by action of
the board or its delegate unless ordered otherwise by the board or its
delegate. The bill would prohibit the state agency from circumventing or
disregarding the board's action by entering another contract for the same or
similar services or to continue the services that were the subject of the
contract that was disapproved. The bill would require the state agency to
serve notice of the discontinuation of the contract to the vendor within 15
days from the board's final action, and to serve a copy of the notice on the
board and the employee organization that filed the contract challenge. The
bill would make a related statement of legislative findings. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 2500 |
Hagman |
Professions
and vocations: licenses: military service. |
||
|
|
Status: |
06/29/2010-From
committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes
0.) (June 28). |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Watch |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
06/29/2010-S
APPR. |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law provides for the licensure and regulation of various professions and
vocations by boards within the Department of Consumer Affairs. Existing law
authorizes a licensee or registrant who permitted his or her license to
expire while serving in any branch of the armed services of the United States
during a period of war, as defined, to, upon application, reinstate his or
her license without examination or penalty if certain requirements are
satisfied. This bill would instead authorize a licensee or registrant whose
license expired while the licensee or registrant was on active duty as a
member of the California National Guard or the United States Armed Forces to,
upon application, reinstate his or her license without examination or penalty
if those requirements are satisfied, unless the licensing agency determines
that the applicant has not actively engaged in the practice of his or her
profession while on active duty, as specified. The bill would make other
conforming and technical changes. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 2593 |
Bradford |
Workers'
compensation: official medical fee schedule. |
||
|
|
Status: |
05/07/2010-Failed
Deadline pursuant to Rule 61(b)(6). (Last location was INS. on 3/18/2010) |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Oppose |
|
|
Priority: |
2 |
||
|
Location: |
05/12/2010-A
DEAD |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law establishes a workers' compensation system, administered by the
Administrative Director of the Division of Workers' Compensation, to
compensate an employee for injuries sustained in the course of his or her
employment. This bill would, instead, provide that for pharmacy services and
drugs that are not otherwise covered by a Medicare fee schedule payment for
facility services, the maximum reasonable fees shall be the lowest of the
average wholesale price minus 17%, the federal upper limit, as defined, or
the maximum allowable ingredient costs, as defined, plus a professional fee
for dispensing that is no less than $7.25 per prescription. This bill
contains other existing laws. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 2627 |
Nielsen |
State contracts:
participation goals. |
||
|
|
Status: |
07/01/2010-From
committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee.
Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on V.A. |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Watch |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
07/01/2010-S
V. A. |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law establishes participation goals for certain state contracts with minority
business enterprises, women business enterprises, and disabled veteran
business enterprises. These provisions, with respect to minority and women
business enterprises, were held unconstitutional on the basis of not meeting
equal protection requirements. The bill would also revise the requirements
imposed on disabled veteran business enterprises to, among other changes,
require a disabled veteran to have at least a 10% service-connected
disability and require a disabled veteran business enterprise to submit
specified income tax information to the Office of Small Business and Disabled
Veteran Business Enterprise Services. This bill contains other related
provisions and other existing laws. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 2630 |
Emmerson |
Income
tax: credits: full-time employees: hires. |
||
|
|
Status: |
05/28/2010-In
committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file. In committee:
Set, first hearing. Held under submission. |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Support |
|
|
Priority: |
2 |
||
|
Location: |
05/28/2010-A
APPR. SUSPENSE FILE |
|||
|
Summary: |
The
Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law authorize various credits
against the taxes imposed by those laws, including a credit for taxable years
beginning on or after January 1, 2009, in the amount of $3,000 for each
full-time employee hired by a qualified employer. Those laws define
"qualified employer" as a taxpayer that employed 20 or fewer
employees as of the last day of the preceding taxable year . This bill would,
under both laws, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2011,
expand the definition of "qualified employer" to mean a taxpayer
that employed 50 or fewer employees as of the last day of the preceding
taxable year . This bill contains other related provisions. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 2649 |
Torrico |
Franchise
Tax Board: professional or occupational licenses. |
||
|
|
Status: |
04/23/2010-Failed
Deadline pursuant to Rule 61(b)(5). (Last location was B. & P. on
3/18/2010) |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Oppose |
|
|
Priority: |
1 |
||
|
Location: |
04/23/2010-A
DEAD |
|||
|
Summary: |
The
Personal Income Tax Law and the Bank and Corporation Tax Law impose taxes on,
or measured by, income. Existing law allows a tax return or return
information filed under those laws to be disclosed in a judicial or
administrative proceeding pertaining to tax administration under certain
circumstances. Existing law requires every board, as defined under the
Business and Professions Code, and the Department of Insurance to, upon
request of the Franchise Tax Board, furnish to the Franchise Tax Board
certain information with respect to every licensee. Existing law authorizes
many of these boards to impose fees on its licensees to cover its costs in
administering its respective provisions and in some cases these funds are
deposited into continuously appropriated funds. This bill would require a
state governmental licensing entity, as defined and excluding the Department
of Motor Vehicles and the Contractor's State License Board, to provide to the
Franchise Tax Board the name and social security number or federal taxpayer
identification number of each individual licensee of that entity. The bill
would require the Franchise Tax Board, if a licensee fails to pay taxes for
which a notice of state tax lien has been recorded, as specified, to mail a
preliminary notice of suspension to the licensee. The bill would provide that
the license of a licensee who fails to satisfy the unpaid taxes by a certain
date shall be automatically suspended, except as specified, and would require
the Franchise Tax Board to provide a notice of suspension to the applicable
state governmental licensing entity and to mail a notice of suspension to the
licensee, and would provide that the suspension be canceled upon compliance
with the tax obligation. The bill would require the Franchise Tax Board to
meet certain requirements and would make related changes. The bill would
authorize a state governmental licensing entity, as specified, to impose a
fee on a licensee with a suspended license in an amount necessary to cover
its administrative costs. The bill would make implementation of its
provisions contingent upon appropriation of funds for that purpose in the
annual Budget Act. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 2695 |
Hernandez |
California
Nursery Producers Commission. |
||
|
|
Status: |
06/28/2010-Do
pass as amended. |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Watch |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
06/28/2010-S
APPR. |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law establishes various commissions to promote agricultural products from the
state. This bill would create the California Nursery Producers Commission in
state government with a prescribed membership, and would specify the powers,
duties, and responsibilities of the commission. The commission would be authorized
to carry out programs of outreach, education, promotion, marketing, and
research relating to nursery products. The bill would authorize the
commission to levy an annual assessment, not to exceed a specified amount, on
producers of nursery products, and would authorize the expenditure of those
funds for purposes of implementing and administering the bill's provisions,
thereby making an appropriation. This bill contains other related provisions
and other existing laws. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 2696 |
Bass |
California
Workforce Investment Board: Green Collar Jobs Council. |
||
|
|
Status: |
06/28/2010-Read
second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Watch |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
06/28/2010-S
APPR. |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law establishes the California Workforce Investment Board (CWIB), and
requires the board to establish a committee known as the Green Collar Jobs
Council (GCJC), comprised of specified members, and requires the GCJC to
perform certain functions and duties, including the development of a
strategic initiative, relating to the training and development of a skilled
workforce to meet the needs of California's emerging green economy. This bill
would authorize the CWIB to accept any revenues, moneys, grants, goods, or
services from federal and state entities, philanthropic organizations, and
other sources, to be used for purposes relating to the administration and
implementation of the strategic initiative. The bill would require the GCJC
to consult with appropriate state and local agencies to identify
opportunities to coordinate the award of grant and green workforce training
funds received by the state under the federal American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009 or any other funding sources. The bill would require
the CWIB, on or before April 1, 2011, and annually each April 1 thereafter,
to report to the Legislature on the status of GCJC activities, grants
awarded, and the development and implementation of a green workforce
strategic initiative. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 2770 |
Monning |
Employee
wages and working hours: violators. |
||
|
|
Status: |
06/24/2010-From
committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 4. Noes
1.) (June 23). |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Watch |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
06/24/2010-S
APPR. |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law requires private employers to perform certain activities with regard to
employee wages, hours, and working conditions. This bill would require the
Labor Commissioner or his or her designee from the Labor and Workforce
Development Agency, in consultation with the Franchise Tax Board and the
Economic and Employment Enforcement Coalition (EEEC), to develop and
implement a set of standards that, if met by an employer, would trigger a
recommendation for an audit or investigation by appropriate state tax
authorities of employers in violation of statutes relating to employee wages,
hours, and working conditions. After July 1, 2011, this bill would require
the Labor Commissioner or the EEEC to take specified actions to facilitate
audits and investigations of employers who meet the standards required by
this bill. This bill also would state findings and declarations relating to
the underground economy. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AB 2776 |
Huffman |
Transfers
of water: agricultural use to municipal use. |
||
|
|
Status: |
06/29/2010-Do
pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations. |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Watch |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
06/29/2010-S
APPR. |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law authorizes the transfer or exchange of certain water or water rights upon
approval by the State Water Resources Control Board of a petition to transfer
the water or water rights. This bill would prohibit the department, with
respect to a contractual entitlement to water from the State Water Project,
and the state board, with respect to any other transfer of water or water
rights, from approving the transfer of surface water or water rights, or a
portion of a contractual entitlement to water from the State Water Project,
from agricultural use to municipal use for a period of 20 years or more,
unless the water user provides to the department or the state board, as
applicable, a written evaluation of the economic, social, and environmental
effects of the transfer upon the service area from which the water is to be transferred.
The bill would prohibit a water user from replacing specified surface water
that is transferred from agricultural use to municipal use with groundwater,
unless the groundwater basin of the service area from which the water is to
be transferred is monitored in accordance with specified requirements. The
bill would require the department and the state board to charge specified
fees to a water user that is subject to these provisions. This bill contains
other existing laws. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
AJR 37 |
De
Leon |
Immigration. |
||
|
|
Status: |
07/01/2010-Senate
amendments concurred in. To enrollment. |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Support |
|
|
Priority: |
2 |
||
|
Location: |
07/01/2010-A
ENROLLMENT |
|||
|
Summary: |
This
measure would specify principles for repairing the nation's broken
immigration system and would urge Congress and the President of the United
States to take a comprehensive and workable approach to improving the
nation's immigration system using those principles. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
SB 60 |
Cedillo |
Vehicles:
driver's licenses. |
||
|
|
Status: |
06/22/2009-Set,
first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author. |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Watch |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
06/08/2009-A
TRANS. |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law requires the Department of Motor Vehicles, upon proper application, to
issue driver's licenses and identification cards. This bill would require the
department, in the issuance of driver' s licenses and identification cards,
to issue licenses and cards that are in compliance with specified
requirements of the federal Real ID Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-13). This
bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
SB 189 |
Lowenthal |
Mechanics
liens. |
||
|
|
Status: |
06/30/2010-Set,
first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author. |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Watch |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
06/15/2010-A
APPR. |
|||
|
Summary: |
The
California Constitution provides that mechanics, persons furnishing
materials, artisans, and laborers of every class have a lien upon the
property upon which they have bestowed labor or furnished material for the
value of the labor done and material furnished. The California Constitution
also requires the Legislature to provide, by law, for the speedy and
efficient enforcement of those liens. This bill would revise and recast those
statutory provisions and make both substantive and technical changes. The
bill would also replace the terms "original contractor" and
"materialman" with the terms "direct contractor" and
"material supplier," respectively. The bill would specifically
authorize the submission of notices by means of electronic communication with
respect to mechanics liens. The bill would also set forth additional
requirements governing the form of security for bonds and would set forth the
security required for large projects with a contract price of greater than
$1,000,000 for the owner of a less than fee interest in property or
$5,000,000 for the owner of the fee interest in the property. This bill
contains other related provisions and other existing laws. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
SB 258 |
Oropeza |
Public
contracts: school districts: bidding requirements. |
||
|
|
Status: |
06/30/2010-From
committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes
3.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Heard in committee on June 29.) |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Watch |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
06/30/2010-A
APPR. |
|||
|
Summary: |
Under
existing law, the governing board of a school district may require each
prospective bidder for certain contracts involving an expenditure of more
than $50,000 to submit a standardized questionnaire and financial statement,
including information relating to financial ability and experience in
performing public works. Existing law further requires a school district
requiring the above information to adopt and apply a uniform system of rating
bidders on the basis of the completed questionnaires and financial
statements, as specified. This bill would require the questionnaire and the
uniform system of rating bidders described above to contain, at a minimum,
substantially similar information, questions, and requirements as that of the
standardized questionnaire and model guidelines for rating bidders developed
by the Department of Industrial Relations for public entities, as specified.
This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
SB 261 |
Dutton |
Water
use: water management plans. |
||
|
|
Status: |
08/27/2009-Set,
first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author. |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Watch |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
08/19/2009-A
APPR. SUSPENSE FILE |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law requires the Department of Water Resources to convene an independent
technical panel to provide information to the department and the Legislature
on new demand management measures, technologies, and approaches. "Demand
management measures" means those water conservation measures, programs,
and incentives that prevent the waste of water and promote the reasonable and
efficient use and reuse of available supplies. Existing law requires urban
water suppliers to prepare and adopt urban water management plans with
specified components. This bill would require a retail urban water supplier,
as defined, to develop and implement an urban water conservation plan, including
prescribed components, or achieve high-efficiency water use, as defined. The
bill would impose various requirements for the contents of these plans, and
would require a retail urban water supplier to update its water conservation
plan on a specified schedule. The retail urban water supplier or other
specified entities acting on behalf of the retail urban water supplier ,
would be required to submit reports for purposes of determining progress
towards achieving a prescribed water conservation goal. This bill contains
other related provisions and other existing laws. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
SB 294 |
Negrete
McLeod |
Department
of Consumer Affairs: regulatory boards. |
||
|
|
Status: |
06/22/2010-From
committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes
0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Heard in committee on June 22.) |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Support |
|
|
Priority: |
2 |
||
|
Location: |
06/22/2010-A
APPR. |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law provides for the licensure and regulation of various healing arts
licensees by various boards, as defined, within the Department of Consumer
Affairs, including the California Board of Occupational Therapy, the
Physician Assistant Committee of the Medical Board of California, and the
Veterinary Medical Board. Existing law requires the committee and authorizes
the Veterinary Medical Board to appoint an executive officer. Under existing
law, those provisions regarding the California Board of Occupational Therapy
will become inoperative on July 1, 2013, and will be repealed on January 1,
2014. Those provisions governing the Physician Assistant Committee of the
Medical Board of California and the Veterinary Medical Board will become
inoperative on July 1, 2011, and will be repealed on January 1, 2012. Under
this bill, the provisions relating to the California Board of Occupational
Therapy would become inoperative and be repealed on January 1, 2014, and the
provisions concerning the Physician Assistant Committee of the Medical Board
of California and the Veterinary Medical Board would become inoperative and
be repealed on January 1, 2013. This bill contains other related provisions
and other existing laws. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
SB 381 |
Wright |
Instruction:
course of study. |
||
|
|
Status: |
08/31/2009-Hearing
postponed by committee. (Refers to 8/27/2009 hearing) |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Support |
|
|
Priority: |
2 |
||
|
Location: |
08/27/2009-A
APPR. SUSPENSE FILE |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law prescribes the course of study a pupil is required to complete while in
grades 9 to 12, inclusive, in order to receive a diploma of graduation.
Existing law authorizes the governing board of a school district to adopt
rules specifying additional coursework requirements. Existing law requires
each school district maintaining any of grades 7 to 12, inclusive, to offer
to all otherwise qualified pupils in those grades a course of study that
provides an opportunity for those pupils to attain entry-level employment
skills in business or industry upon graduation from high school. This bill
would prohibit a school district from adopting a graduation requirement that
commences with the 2010-11 school year and requires the completion of
additional coursework to meet or exceed the requirements and prerequisites
for admission to a 4-year California public university unless the district
also requires the completion of a sequence of at least 3 career and technical
education courses. However, this provision would not apply to a school
district that, by June 30, 2009, has adopted graduation requirements that
require the completion of all minimum coursework necessary to meet the
requirements and prerequisites for admission to a 4-year California public
university. This bill contains other related provisions. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
SB 389 |
Negrete
McLeod |
Professions
and vocations. |
||
|
|
Status: |
07/07/2009-Set,
first hearing. Failed passage in committee. Reconsideration granted. |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Watch |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
07/07/2009-A
PUB. S. |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law provides for the licensure and regulation of various professions and
vocations by boards within the Department of Consumer Affairs. Existing law
authorizes a board to suspend or revoke a license on various grounds,
including, but not limited to, conviction of a crime, if the crime is
substantially related to the qualifications, functions, or duties of the
business or profession for which the license was issued. Existing law
requires applicants to certain boards to provide a full set of fingerprints
for the purpose of conducting criminal history record checks. This bill would
make that fingerprinting requirement applicable to the Dental Board of
California, the Dental Hygiene Committee of California, the Professional
Fiduciaries Bureau, the Osteopathic Medical Board of California, the
California Board of Podiatric Medicine, and the State Board of Chiropractic
Examiners. The bill would require new applicants for a license and
petitioners for reinstatement of a revoked, surrendered, or canceled license,
to successfully complete a state and federal level criminal record
information search. The bill would also require, commencing January 1, 2011,
licensees who have not previously submitted fingerprints, or for whom a
record of the submission of fingerprints no longer exists, to complete the
process necessary for a state and federal level criminal offender record
information search, as specified. The bill would require licensees applying
for licens e renewal to certify compliance with that requirement, as
specified, and would subject a licensee to disciplinary action for making a
false certification. The bill would also require a licensee to, as a
condition of renewal of the license, notify the board on the license renewal
form if he or she , or any member of the personnel of record of the licensee,
has been convicted, as defined, of a felony or misdemeanor since the last
renewal, or if this is the licensee's first renewal, since the initial
license was issued. The bill would provide that the Contractors' State
License Board shall implement the provisions pertaining to renewal licenses
on a specified schedule, after an appropriation is made for this purpose,
utilizing its applicable fees. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
SB 392 |
Florez |
Contractors:
limited liability companies. |
||
|
|
Status: |
06/23/2010-Read
second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Watch |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
06/23/2010-A
APPR. |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law, the Beverly-Killea Limited Liability Company Act, authorizes a limited
liability company to engage in any lawful business activity, except as
specified, but prohibits construing the act to permit a limited liability
company to render professional services, as defined. This bill would
authorize a limited liability company to render services that may be lawfully
rendered only pursuant to a license, certificate, or registration authorized
by the Business and Professions Code if the provisions of that code authorize
a limited liability company to hold that license, certificate, or
registration. The bill would authorize the board, commencing no later than
January 1, 2012 , to issue a contractor's license to a limited liability
company and would authorize the responsible managing manager, responsible
managing officer, responsible managing member, or responsible managing
employee of the limited liability company to qualify for that license. The
bill would also require, as a condition precedent to the issuance,
reissuance, reinstatement, reactivation, renewal, or continued valid use of a
limited liability company contractor's license, that the applicant or
licensee file or have on file a surety bond in the sum of $100,000 for
damages arising out of specified claims of employees. The bill would also
require the limited liability company to maintain a policy or policies of
insurance against liability imposed on or against it for damages arising out
of claims, as specified, as a condition of licensure, and would require the
licensed limited liability company to provide a notice concerning that
insurance or security in certain contracts, as specified. The bill would
provide for the personal liability of persons within the limited liability
company in a certain instance, except as specified. The bill would also enact
related, conforming provisions. Because the bill would impose various fees on
limited liability companies that apply for and obtain a contractor's license,
the bill would increase the amount of revenue deposited in the Contractors'
License Fund, thereby making an appropriation. In addition, because a
violation of specified provisions of the Contractors' State License Law by a
limited liability company licensed pursuant to these provisions would be a
crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill
contains other related provisions and other existing laws. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
SB 464 |
Strickland |
Income
and corporation taxes: credits: diesel particulate matter reduction. |
||
|
|
Status: |
02/01/2010-Returned
to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56. |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Support |
|
|
Priority: |
2 |
||
|
Location: |
02/01/2010-S
DEAD |
|||
|
Summary: |
The
Personal Income Tax Law and the Bank and Corporation Tax Law authorize
various credits against the taxes imposed by those laws. This bill would
allow a credit for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2009, and
before January 1, 2019, in an amount equal to 5% of the amount paid or
incurred for qualified property, as defined, not to exceed $10,000, that is
used to meet diesel particulate matter reduction requirements. This bill
contains other related provisions. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
SB 477 |
Florez |
Employment:
heat illness prevention. |
||
|
|
Status: |
06/24/2010-From
committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes
1.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Heard in committee on June 23.) |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Oppose |
|
|
Priority: |
3 |
||
|
Location: |
06/24/2010-A
APPR. |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law permits the Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board within the
Department of Industrial Relations to adopt occupational health and safety
standards to protect the welfare of employees, and existing regulations provide
for the prevention of heat-related illness of employees, as prescribed. Under
existing law, it is a misdemeanor for an employer to violate a safety
standard if the violation has a substantial probability of resulting in death
or serious physical harm. This bill would incorporate certain of these
regulatory provisions into statute. The bill would additionally specify
requirements for employers to provide employees access to shade when the
temperature exceeds 85 degrees Fahrenheit and to implement designated
high-heat procedures when the temperature equals or exceeds 95 degrees
Fahrenheit. The bill would prohibit an employer from allowing an employee or
a supervisor to engage in outdoor work without receiving training on
specified topics and would require the employer to designate a person to
ensure that emergency procedures are invoked when appropriate. This bill
contains other related provisions and other existing laws. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
SB 515 |
Hancock |
Career
technical education. |
||
|
|
Status: |
09/11/2009-Placed
on inactive file on request of Assembly Member Torrico. |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Watch |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
09/11/2009-S
INACTIVE FILE |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law requires the governing board of each regional occupational center or
program, on or before July 1, 2010, to ensure that at least 90% of all
state-funded courses offered by the center or program, in occupational areas
in which both the program or center and the community college offer
instruction, are part of occupational course sequences that target
comprehensive skills. Existing law additionally requires, as a condition of
receiving federal funds provided under the Carl D. Perkins Vocational and
Applied Technology Education Act of 1998, and to the extent permitted under
federal law, that school districts, regional occupational centers or
programs, and community college districts comply with specified requirements
relating to the development of course sequences. This bill would additionally
require, commencing with the 2012-13 fiscal year, as a condition of receiving
federal funds provided under the Carl D. Perkins Vocational and Applied
Technology Education Act of 1998, and to the extent permitted under federal
law, that school districts, regional occupational centers or programs, and
community college districts demonstrate that at least one-half of the course
sequences offered are linked to high priority workforce needs in the career
sectors identified by the Labor and Workforce Development Agency or the Labor
Market Information Division of the Employment Development Department for the
State of California , for the economic region established by the state where
the regional occupational center or program, community college district, or
school district is located , or for the county where the regional
occupational center or program, community college district, or school
district is located . The bill would encourage school districts, regional
occupational centers or programs, and community college districts to work
with local workforce investment boards and the Labor Market Information
Division of the Employment Development Department in the identification of
career sectors of high priority. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
SB 518 |
Lowenthal |
Building
standards: graywater. |
||
|
|
Status: |
07/01/2010-Read
second time. To Consent Calendar. |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Watch |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
07/01/2010-A
CONSENT CALENDAR |
|||
|
Summary: |
The
California Building Standards Law provides for the adoption of building
standards by state agencies by requiring all state agencies that adopt or
propose adoption of any building standard to submit the building standard to
the California Building Standards Commission for approval and adoption. This
bill would require the commission, as a part of the next triennial edition of
the California Building Standards Code adopted after January 1, 2011, to
adopt building standards for the construction, installation, and alteration
of graywater systems for indoor and outdoor uses in nonresidential
occupancies, in accordance with prescribed requirements. The bill would
terminate the authority of the Department of Water Resources to adopt
standards for graywater systems in nonresidential occupancies upon adoption
of the standards by the commission. This bill contains other existing laws. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
SB 565 |
Pavley |
Water
resources. |
||
|
|
Status: |
07/01/2010-From
committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR.
(Ayes 7. Noes 6.) (Heard in committee on June 29.) |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Watch |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
07/01/2010-A
APPR. |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law generally prohibits the state, or a county, city, district, or other
political subdivision, or any public officer or body acting in its official
capacity on behalf of any of those entities, from being required to pay any
fee for the performance of an official service. Existing law exempts from
this provision any fee or charge for official services required pursuant to
specified provisions of law relating to water use or water quality. This bill
would expand the exemption to other provisions relating to water use,
including provisions that require the payment of fees to the State Water
Resources Control Board (board) for official services relating to statements
of water diversion and use. This bill contains other related provisions and
other existing laws. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
SB 629 |
Liu |
Private
works of improvement: retention proceeds. |
||
|
|
Status: |
09/10/2009-Placed
on inactive file on request of Senator Liu. |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Support |
|
|
Priority: |
2 |
||
|
Location: |
09/10/2009-S
INACTIVE FILE |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law generally regulates the terms and conditions of contracts for private
works of improvement. Existing law requires that, within 45 days after the
date of completion, as defined, retention proceeds withheld from any payment
by the owner to the original contractor, or by the original contractor to any
subcontractor, be released, except as specified. Existing law provides that,
if a bona fide dispute exists between an original contractor and a
subcontractor, the original contractor may withhold from the retention
payment up to 150% of the disputed amount. This bill, applicable to contracts
entered into on or after January 1, 2010, would prohibit retention proceeds
withheld from any payment made by the owner to the original contractor from
exceeding 5% of the amount of the payment otherwise due under the contract.
The bill would prohibit the percentage of the retention proceeds withheld
from any payment made by the original contractor to any subcontractor, or by
a subcontractor to another subcontractor, from exceeding 5% of the amount of
the payment otherwise due under the contract, or the percentage of each
payment that may be withheld under the contract between the owner and the
original contractor, whichever is less. This bill would require that with
respect to a contract between an owner and an original contractor, between an
original contractor and a subcontractor, or between 2 subcontractors, any
retention proceeds withheld shall be released within 45 days after the party
seeking payment serves a fully executed conditional waiver and release, as
provided. The bill would provide that it does not prohibit the withholding of
funds pursuant to the above provisions of law governing amounts in dispute.
This bill would also provide that these provisions shall not apply if the
owner or original contractor provides written notice to the original
contractor or subcontractor, prior to or at the time that the bid is
requested, that performance and payment bonds may be required. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
SB 638 |
Negrete
McLeod |
Regulatory
boards: operations. |
||
|
|
Status: |
01/15/2010-Failed
Deadline pursuant to Rule 61(b)(1). (Last location was 2 YEAR on 5/1/2009) |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Oppose |
|
|
Priority: |
2 |
||
|
Location: |
01/15/2010-S
DEAD |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law creates various regulatory boards, as defined, within the Department of
Consumer Affairs, with board members serving specified terms of office.
Existing law generally makes the regulatory boards inoperative and repealed
on specified dates, unless those dates are deleted or extended by subsequent
legislation, and subjects these boards that are scheduled to become
inoperative and repealed as well as other boards in state government, as
specified, to review by the Joint Committee on Boards, Commissions, and
Consumer Protection. Under existing law, that committee, following a
specified procedure, recommends whether the board should be continued or its
functions modified. Existing law requires the State Board of Chiropractic
Examiners and the Osteopathic Medical Board of California to submit certain
analyses and reports to the committee on specified dates and requires the
committee to review those boards and hold hearings as specified, and to make
certain evaluations and findings. This bill would abolish the Joint Committee
on Boards, Commissions, and Consumer Protection and would authorize the
appropriate policy committees of the Legislature to carry out its duties. The
bill would terminate the terms of office of each board member or bureau chief
within the department on unspecified dates and would authorize successor
board members and bureau chiefs to be appointed, as specified. The bill would
also subject interior design organizations, the State Board of Chiropractic
Examiners, the Osteopathic Medical Board of California, and the Tax Education
Council to review on unspecified dates. The bill would authorize the
appropriate policy committees of the Legislature to review the boards,
bureaus, or entities that are scheduled to have their board membership or
bureau chief so terminated or reviewed, as specified, and would authorize the
appropriate policy committees of the Legislature to investigate their
operations and to hold specified public hearings. The bill would require a
board, bureau, or entity, if their annual report contains certain
information, to post it on its Internet Web site. The bill would make other
conforming changes. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
SB 694 |
Correa |
Public
contracts: public works: competitive bidding: procedures. |
||
|
|
Status: |
06/23/2010-Read
second time. To third reading. |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Watch |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
06/23/2010-A
THIRD READING |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law allows a public agency to elect to be subject to the Uniform Public
Construction Cost Accounting Act, which authorizes bidding procedures for
public projects, as specified. The act establishes the California Uniform
Construction Cost Accounting Commission, which is charged with specified
duties, including recommending for adoption by the Controller uniform
construction cost accounting procedures for implementation by public agencies
in the performance of, or in contracting for, construction on public
projects. Under the act, each commission member serves without compensation,
but is required to be reimbursed for travel and other expenses incurred, and
the commission is authorized to accept grants from federal, state, or local
public agencies, or private foundations or individuals, to assist it in
carrying out its duties. This bill would extend the time to 8 business days
to request a commission review, to 45 days for a commission review of a
public agency project that is to be performed after rejection of all bids,
and to 90 days for a commission review of work for which evidence was
provided that the work has exceeded the force account limits or has been
improperly classified as maintenance. This bill contains other existing laws. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
SB 773 |
Florez |
Workers'
compensation: disability benefits. |
||
|
|
Status: |
01/22/2010-Failed
Deadline pursuant to Rule 61(b)(2). (Last location was 2 YEAR on 6/8/2009) |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Oppose |
|
|
Priority: |
2 |
||
|
Location: |
01/22/2010-S
DEAD |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law establishes a workers' compensation system, administered by the
Administrative Director of the Division of Workers' Compensation, that
generally requires employers to secure the payment of workers' compensation,
including medical treatment, for injuries incurred by their employees that
arise out of, and in the course of, employment. Existing law provides certain
methods for determining workers' compensation benefits payable to a worker or
his or her dependents for purposes of temporary disability, permanent total disability,
permanent partial disability, and in case of death. This bill would state the
intent of the Legislature to enact legislation that would adjust the amount
of permanent partial disability benefits paid to workers in order to ensure
that the benefits are fair, adequate, and more favorably aligned when
compared with permanent partial disability benefits paid to workers in other
states. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
SB 802 |
Leno |
Works of
improvement: progress payments: notice: retention proceeds. |
||
|
|
Status: |
10/11/2009-Vetoed
by the Governor |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Support |
|
|
Priority: |
2 |
||
|
Location: |
10/11/2009-S
VETOED |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law requires that, for private and public works of improvement, and in a
public works contract, a prime contractor or subcontractor pay to any
subcontractor, not later than 10 days after receipt of each progress payment,
unless otherwise agreed to in writing, the respective amount allowed the
contractor on account of the work performed by the subcontractors, to the
extent of each contractor's interest therein, as prescribed. This bill would,
instead, require that those amounts be paid not later than 7 days after
receipt of each progress payment. This bill contains other related provisions
and other existing laws. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
SB 879 |
Cox |
Counties:
cities: construction projects: alternative bidding procedures: design-build. |
||
|
|
Status: |
06/17/2010-From
committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes
3.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Heard in Committee on June 16.) |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Watch |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
06/17/2010-A
APPR. |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law authorizes counties to use alternative procedures, known as design-build,
for bidding on construction projects in the county in excess of $2,500,000,
in accordance with specified procedures. These procedures include a
requirement for contracts awarded, as specified, that a county board of
supervisors pay a fee into the State Public Works Enforcement Fund, which
funds are continuously appropriated for the Department of Industrial
Relations' enforcement of prevailing wage requirements on public works
projects. Each county that elects to use the design-build method on a public
works project is required to submit a report to the Legislative Analyst's
Office before December 1, 2009, containing a description of each public works
project procured through the design-build process and completed after
November 1, 2004, and before November 1, 2009. Existing law also requires the
Legislative Analyst, on or before January 1, 2010, to report to the
Legislature on the use of the design-build method by counties. This bill
would instead authorize counties to use these alternative procedures, known
as design-build, for bidding on construction projects in the county in excess
of $1,000,000, and would make various changes in the procedures required for
the use of design-build by those counties, as specified. The bill would also
revise those reporting provisions to require each county electing to use the
design-build method on a public works project to submit to the Legislative
Analyst's Office before December 1, 2014, a report containing a description
of each public works project procured through the design-build process and
completed after November 1, 2009, and before November 1, 2014. This bill
contains other related provisions and other existing laws. |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
SB 918 |
Pavley |
Water
recycling. |
||
|
|
Status: |
06/30/2010-From
committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes
2.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Heard in committee on June 29.) |
||
|
|
Lobbyist: |
PDT |
Position: |
Watch |
|
|
Priority: |
|
||
|
Location: |
06/30/2010-A
APPR. |
|||
|
Summary: |
Existing
law establishes the State Water Resources Control Board and the California
regional water quality control boards as the principal state agencies with
authority over matters relating to water quality. Existing law requires the
State Department of Public Health to establish uniform statewide recycling
criteria for each varying type of use for recycled water where the use
involves the protection of public health. This bill would require the State
Department of Public Health to adopt uniform water recycling criteria for
indirect potable water reuse for groundwater recharge, as defined, by
December 31, 2013 . The bill would require the department to develop and
adopt uniform water recycling criteria for surface water augmentation, as
defined, by December 31, 2016 , if a specified expert panel convened pursuant
to the bill finds that the criteria would adequately protect public health .
The bill would require the department to investigate the feasibility of
developing uniform water recycling criteria for direct potable reuse and to
provide a final report on that investigation to the Legislature by December
31, 2016. The bill, from July 1, 2011, to June 30, 2017, inclusive, would
require funds generated by the imposition of specified liabilities for
violations of water quality requirements to be made available, upon
appropriation by the Legislature, to the department for purposes of
developing and adopting the water recycling criteria . |
|||
|
Assignment: |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
SB 972 |
Wolk |